Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Date
Msg-id 4BEE3ABD02000025000317EA@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
List pgsql-hackers
Rob Wultsch  wrote:
> Have you looked at PBXT (which is explicitly NOT SERIALIZABLE)?
I hadn't heard of it; so I took a quick look based on your post.  It
seems to a new engine to use with MySQL which has MVCC without a
rollback log, so it presumably uses techniques at least vaguely
similar to PostgreSQL.  Anything in particular you wanted me to
notice about it besides that?  (Of course another MySQL engine which
doesn't provide very strong integrity guarantees isn't exciting to
me as a technology in itself.)
-Kevin




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: predefined macros for various BSD-based systems?
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: How to know killed by pg_terminate_backend