Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> If a backend killed by pg_terminate_backend(), the backend returns
> 57P01 which is identical to the one when it's killed by postmaster.
>
> Problem is, pgpool-II needs to trigger failover if postmaster goes
> down because apparently pgpool-II cannot use the PostgreSQL server
> anymore.
>
> On the otherhand, pg_terminate_backend() just terminates a backend. So
> triggering failover is overkill.
>
> Maybe we could make PostgreSQL a little bit smarter so that it returns
> a different code than 57P01 when killed by pg_terminate_backend().
Seems reasonable. Does the victim backend currently know why it has been
killed?
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
