Tom Lane wrote:
> If so, master/standby would probably work.
+1 for master/standby.
It's worth remembering that a "standby server" might not be actively
connected to a master server. A server that's reading WAL from an
archive backup, for example, can be put to standby mode. "Standby"
covers that case too, better than "slave".
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
