Re: GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue
Date
Msg-id 4BBE5F1F.1000101@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue  (Necati Batur <necatibatur@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GSOC PostgreSQL partitioning issue  (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
An introduction to the current state of work in progress for adding 
improved partitioning features to PostgreSQL is documented at 
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning

If you can find a small, targeted piece of that overall plan that builds 
on the work already done, and is in the direction of the final goal 
here, you may be able to make useful progress in a few months time.  
This area is extremely well explored already.  There are 13 mailing list 
threads you'll need to browse through carefully just to have enough 
background that you're likely to build something new, rather than just 
wandering down a path that's already been followed but leads to a dead end.

You have picked a PostgreSQL feature that is dramatically more difficult 
than it appears to be, and I wouldn't expect you'll actually finish even 
a fraction of your goals in a summer of work.  You're at least in 
plentiful company--most students do the same.  As a rule, if you see a 
feature on our TODO list that looks really useful and fun to work on, 
it's only still there because people have tried multiple times to build 
it completely but not managed to do so because it's harder than it 
appears.  This is certainly the case with improving the partitioning 
support that's built in to the database.

-- 
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Unsafe threading in syslogger on Windows
Next
From: Joshua Tolley
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection