Am 30.10.2018 um 16:04 schrieb Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:Axel Rau <Axel.Rau@Chaos1.DE> writes:Am 30.10.2018 um 14:45 schrieb Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:Axel, would you try two more things on that DB?nextcloud=> explain select ((pg_has_role(relowner, 'USAGE'::text) OR has_sequence_privilege(oid, 'SELECT, UPDATE, USAGE'::text))) from pg_class; QUERY PLAN -----------------------------------------------------------Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=0.00..28.56 rows=656 width=1)(1 row)nextcloud=> explain select (relkind = 'S'::"char") from pg_class; QUERY PLAN -----------------------------------------------------------Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=0.00..28.56 rows=656 width=1)(1 row)That is ... odd. Is it possible that you have cpu_operator_cost setto zero, or some very tiny number?
Am 30.10.2018 um 14:45 schrieb Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:Axel, would you try two more things on that DB?
Axel, would you try two more things on that DB?
nextcloud=> explain select ((pg_has_role(relowner, 'USAGE'::text) OR has_sequence_privilege(oid, 'SELECT, UPDATE, USAGE'::text))) from pg_class; QUERY PLAN -----------------------------------------------------------Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=0.00..28.56 rows=656 width=1)(1 row)
nextcloud=> explain select (relkind = 'S'::"char") from pg_class; QUERY PLAN -----------------------------------------------------------Seq Scan on pg_class (cost=0.00..28.56 rows=656 width=1)(1 row)
pgsql-admin by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных