Robert Haas wrote:
> This seems pretty reasonable to me, especially considering that JDBC
> is apparently already doing it. I suppose there will always be
> projects that want to reimplement the backend protocol so that they
> can be "pure" some-language, but chipping away at the list of other
> reasons why someone might not want to use libpq still seems like a
> good idea.
>
> ...Robert
>
Hello Robert,
Thank you for your support, but am unsure if it is wise to put time in
it due to the other reactions.
regards,
Yeb Havinga
