Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY and notification timing guarantees - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY and notification timing guarantees
Date
Msg-id 4B7A3BAC020000250002F304@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to LISTEN/NOTIFY and notification timing guarantees  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY and notification timing guarantees
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane  wrote:
> We could adopt the historical policy of sending self-notifies
> pre-commit, but that doesn't seem tremendously appetizing from the
> standpoint of transactional integrity.
But one traditional aspect of transactional integrity is that a
transaction always sees *its own* uncommitted work.  Wouldn't the
historical policy of PostgreSQL self-notifies be consistent with
that?
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: MIT Kerberos support in Windows builds
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming replication on win32, still broken