Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
Date
Msg-id 4B73DB9F020000250002F1AE@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've sometimes wondered why keepalives aren't the default for all
> TCP connections.  They seem like they're usually a Good Thing
> (TM), but I wonder if we can think of any situations where someone
> might not want them?
I think it's insane not to use them at all, but there are valid use
cases for different timings.  Personally, I'd be happy to see a
default of sending them if a connection is idle for two minutes, but
those people who create 2000 lightly used connections to the
database might feel differently.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL (which was known for a little while
Next
From: Koichi Suzuki
Date:
Subject: Bug on pg_lesslog