Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!

From: Kevin Grittner
Subject: Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!
Date: ,
Msg-id: 4B714AAA020000250002F0F5@gw.wicourts.gov
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Amitabh Kant)
List: pgsql-performance

Tree view

moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  ("Kevin Grittner", )
 Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Jesper Krogh, )
  Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  ("Kevin Grittner", )
   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Amitabh Kant, )
    Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  ("Kevin Grittner", )
   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Bruce Momjian, )
    Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Scott Marlowe, )
   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  ("Kevin Grittner", )
    Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Alvaro Herrera, )
     Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Aidan Van Dyk, )
      Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  ("Kevin Grittner", )
 Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  ("Kevin Grittner", )
  Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Alvaro Herrera, )
   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Alvaro Herrera, )
    Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  ("Kevin Grittner", )
     Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Alvaro Herrera, )
  Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Greg Smith, )
   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  ("Kevin Grittner", )
    Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!  (Ben Chobot, )

Amitabh Kant <> wrote:

> Just curious if you have a 16 physical CPU's or 16 cores on 4
> CPU/8 cores over 2 CPU with HT.

Four quad core CPUs:

vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 15
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X7350  @ 2.93GHz
stepping        : 11
cpu MHz         : 2931.978
cache size      : 4096 KB
physical id     : 3
siblings        : 4
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 4

-Kevin


pgsql-performance by date:

From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY
From: Dimi Paun
Date:
Subject: Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY