Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

9 February 2010

• 07:12   index is not using? AI Rumman
• 07:33   Re: index is not using? Scott Marlowe
• 08:34   Re: [GENERAL] index is not using Guillaume Lelarge
• 08:44   Re: [GENERAL] index is not using Scott Marlowe
• 14:25   Re: foreign key constraint lock behavour in postgresql Albe Laurenz
• 15:14   moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Kevin Grittner
• 15:23   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Jesper Krogh
• 15:33   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Kevin Grittner
• 16:37   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Amitabh Kant
• 16:45   Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it! Kevin Grittner
• 19:15   Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline Jeff
• 21:12   DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Dimi Paun
• 21:22   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Thom Brown
• 21:38   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Tom Lane

10 February 2010

• 00:44   Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY Dimi Paun
• 03:11   PostgreSQL - case studies Jayadevan M
• 03:34   512,600ms query becomes 7500ms... but why? Postgres 8.3 query planner quirk? Bryce Nesbitt
• 03:39   Re: PostgreSQL - case studies Amitabh Kant
• 04:10   How exactly PostgreSQL allocates memory for its needs? Anton Maksimenkov
• 04:49   Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL - case studies Scott Marlowe
• 05:37   Re: Linux I/O tuning: CFQ vs. deadline Greg Smith