Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?
Date
Msg-id 4B5E01D8.7040505@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> My suggestion would be to start a new thread entirely.
>   

And mine would be to drop this whole topic altogether until after the 
CommitFest is over, and instead focus on the replication features 
already committed that need work before beta can even start.  Only 
reason I said something is that I objected to the idea that the 
information on the wiki was complete enough to be considered a roadmap 
for others to follow in this area and wanted to clarify that it 
wasn't--it's helpful, but everybody knows it still needs work yet.  
Actually improving things enough that it is, that work I think is well 
outside of what this list should be focusing on right now.  We've got 
pgsql-cluster-hackers to discuss this particular area.

-- 
Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com  www.2ndQuadrant.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: default pg_hba.conf tabulation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values