Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?
Date
Msg-id 1264445581.6089.46.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core?  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 10:50 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Please rename this thread.  I think that several people to whom it's
> relevant aren't replying to it because of the deceptive name.  Thanks.
>

Except that it is. This thread was about whether or not, Mammoth would
be considered to be in core. Which is fairly independent of the
clustering docs.

My suggestion would be to start a new thread entirely.

Joshua D. Drake


> --Josh
>


--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: handling contrib directories as modules not shared libraries
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG patch 4.1, out-of-scope cursor support in native mode