Re: Streaming Replication and archiving - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Kirkwood
Subject Re: Streaming Replication and archiving
Date
Msg-id 4B5776A5.4030909@catalyst.net.nz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Streaming Replication and archiving  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Streaming Replication and archiving  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Thanks Dimitri, I'd missed that thread. Ok, slave will need a suitable
>> restore_comand in addition to primary_conninfo in recovery.conf, and
>> then extended communication failures (or shutting down the slave for a
>> while!) will not break the streaming setup (FWIW I tried this just now).
>>     
>
> Sure, but if the archived WAL segments are NOT needed, how are they
> supposed to get deleted?  It doesn't take long to run out of disk space
> if they're not being rotated.
>
>   

+1
From what I am seeing at the moment (8.5 devel from 2 days ago), the 
archived segments are not deleted at all (I have several hundred now 
after a number of pgbench runs over the last day or so).

regards

Mark


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: per-user pg_service.conf
Next
From: James William Pye
Date:
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Python verison for build in config.pl (Win32)