Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what Kevin's goal is here.
I think it would be insane to try to do something like serializable
isolation mode without having regression tests. I would want more
tests than could reasonably go into the 'make check' suite to support
development, but it would be very good to have some go in there.
> For basic regression tests, yeah, we'd probably like to keep that
> Perl-free.
OK. Is parallel psql the only reasonable option?
> For more complex testing, I think using Perl makes sense. Or to put
> the shoe on the other foot, if we DON'T allow the use of Perl for
> more complex testing, then we're probably not going to have any
> more complex tests.
Do you envision some test suite committed to CVS beyond the 'make
check' tests, for "on demand" testing at a more rigorous level?
Am I missing something that's already there?
-Kevin
