Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns
Date
Msg-id 4B3B329C020000250002DAB4@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> If, say, your stats say there's 2B rows in the table but there's
> actually 2.5B, that's a big error, but unlikely to change the
> types of plans you get.  Once there's millions of distinct values
> it's takes a big change for plans to shift, etc.
Well, the exception to that is if the stats say that your highest
value is x, and there are actually 500 million rows with values
greater than x, you can get some very bad plans for queries
requiring a range of values above x.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: KNNGiST for knn-search (WIP)