Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement
Date
Msg-id 4B2A1B2B020000250002D703@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm not very sure what a clearer explanation would look like
As a stab at it, how about?:
This behavior makes Read Committed mode unsuitable for many UPDATE
or DELETE commands with joins or subqueries
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement