Re: BUG #5238: frequent signal 11 segfaults - Mailing list pgsql-bugs
From | Nagy Daniel |
---|---|
Subject | Re: BUG #5238: frequent signal 11 segfaults |
Date | |
Msg-id | 4B2770B0.7040007@telekom.hu Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: BUG #5238: frequent signal 11 segfaults (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
List | pgsql-bugs |
I upgraded to 8.4.2, did a full reindex and vacuum (there were no errors). But it segfaults as well: Core was generated by `postgres: randir lovehunter 127.0.0.1(48268) SELECT '. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. [New process 7262] #0 slot_deform_tuple (slot=0xc0d3b8, natts=20) at heaptuple.c:1130 1130 off = att_align_pointer(off, thisatt->attalign, -1, (gdb) bt #0 slot_deform_tuple (slot=0xc0d3b8, natts=20) at heaptuple.c:1130 #1 0x0000000000453b9a in slot_getattr (slot=0xc0d3b8, attnum=20, isnull=0x7fffe48130af "") at heaptuple.c:1253 #2 0x000000000054418c in ExecEvalNot (notclause=<value optimized out>, econtext=0x1dda4503, isNull=0x7fffe48130af "", isDone=<value optimized out>) at execQual.c:2420 #3 0x000000000054466b in ExecQual (qual=<value optimized out>, econtext=0xc17000, resultForNull=0 '\0') at execQual.c:4909 #4 0x000000000054ae55 in ExecScan (node=0xc16ef0, accessMtd=0x550b80 <BitmapHeapNext>) at execScan.c:131 #5 0x0000000000543da0 in ExecProcNode (node=0xc16ef0) at execProcnode.c:373 #6 0x0000000000553516 in ExecHashJoin (node=0xc15dd0) at nodeHashjoin.c:598 #7 0x0000000000543de8 in ExecProcNode (node=0xc15dd0) at execProcnode.c:412 #8 0x0000000000556367 in ExecNestLoop (node=0xc14cc0) at nodeNestloop.c:120 #9 0x0000000000543e18 in ExecProcNode (node=0xc14cc0) at execProcnode.c:404 #10 0x0000000000556367 in ExecNestLoop (node=0xc12ee0) at nodeNestloop.c:120 #11 0x0000000000543e18 in ExecProcNode (node=0xc12ee0) at execProcnode.c:404 #12 0x0000000000556367 in ExecNestLoop (node=0xc110e0) at nodeNestloop.c:120 #13 0x0000000000543e18 in ExecProcNode (node=0xc110e0) at execProcnode.c:404 #14 0x0000000000557cc1 in ExecSort (node=0xc0eec0) at nodeSort.c:102 #15 0x0000000000543d10 in ExecProcNode (node=0xc0eec0) at execProcnode.c:423 #16 0x00000000005418b2 in standard_ExecutorRun (queryDesc=0xbb95e0, direction=ForwardScanDirection, count=0) at execMain.c:1504 #17 0x00000000005ed687 in PortalRunSelect (portal=0xbf7000, forward=<value optimized out>, count=0, dest=0x7f863746adb8) at pquery.c:953 #18 0x00000000005eea39 in PortalRun (portal=0xbf7000, count=9223372036854775807, isTopLevel=1 '\001', dest=0x7f863746adb8, altdest=0x7f863746adb8, completionTag=0x7fffe4813650 "") at pquery.c:779 #19 0x00000000005e9e07 in exec_simple_query ( query_string=0xb82e10 "SELECT * FROM valogatas WHERE uid!='64708' AND eletkor BETWEEN 40 AND 52 AND megyeid='9' AND keresettnem='t' AND dom='iwiw.hu' AND appid='2001434963' AND nem='f' ORDER BY random() DESC") at postgres.c:991 #20 0x00000000005eb3d7 in PostgresMain (argc=4, argv=<value optimized out>, username=0xacfe90 "randir") at postgres.c:3614 #21 0x00000000005bfe18 in ServerLoop () at postmaster.c:3449 #22 0x00000000005c0ba7 in PostmasterMain (argc=5, argv=0xacaa90) at postmaster.c:1040 #23 0x000000000056a568 in main (argc=5, argv=0xacaa90) at main.c:188 (gdb) p (char *) debug_query_string $1 = 0xb82e10 "SELECT * FROM valogatas WHERE uid!='64708' AND eletkor BETWEEN 40 AND 52 AND megyeid='9' AND keresettnem='t' AND dom='iwiw.hu' AND appid='2001434963' AND nem='f' ORDER BY random() DESC" When I run this query manually, it works. Regards, Daniel Tom Lane wrote: > Nagy Daniel <nagy.daniel@telekom.hu> writes: >> I have pg segfaults on two boxes, a DL160G6 and a DL380g5. >> I've just checked their memory with memtest86+ v2.11 >> No errors were detected. >> We also monitor the boxes via IPMI, and there are no signs >> of HW failures. > > Hm. Well, now that 8.4.2 is out, the first thing you ought to do is > update and see if this happens to be resolved by any of the recent > fixes. (I'm not too optimistic about that, because it doesn't look > exactly like any of the known symptoms, but an update is certainly > worth your time in any case.) > > If you still see it after that, please try to extract a reproducible > test case. > > regards, tom lane
pgsql-bugs by date: