Re: YAML - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: YAML
Date
Msg-id 4B1E5EF6.9030301@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: YAML  (Tim Bunce <Tim.Bunce@pobox.com>)
Responses Re: YAML  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> I've no contribution to the main topic, but I'd like to point out that
> the "JSON is a subset of YAML" meme is not without controversy:
>
>   http://search.cpan.org/~mlehmann/JSON-XS-2.26/XS.pm#JSON_and_YAML
>
> It may not be relevant in your use-case, but I thought it worth a mention.
>
>
>   

Ouch. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.

Well, if we're going to commit this, as now appears likely, we should 
have some language lawyers go over our code for both YAML and JSON with 
a fine tooth comb to make sure what we are producing is strictly 
According To Hoyle.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tim Bunce
Date:
Subject: Re: YAML
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: YAML