Re: YAML - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tim Bunce
Subject Re: YAML
Date
Msg-id 20091208131642.GA49023@timac.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: YAML  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: YAML  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 07:07:13PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Not everything is sanely convertible into some sort of plugin. A plugin
>>> mechanism for this would be FAR more trouble that it is worth, IMNSHO.
>>>
>>> We are massively over-egging this pudding (as a culinary blogger you
>>> should appreciate this analogy).
>>>     
>>
>> OK, then let's just accept it.  It's small, has a maintainer, is useful
>> to some people, and doesn't create any wierd complications.  I think,
>> given the knowledge that YAML is now a subdialect of JSON it could
>> potentially be made smaller, but I can't say how at the moment.
>
> Actually, it's the other way, JSON is a subset of YAML.

I've no contribution to the main topic, but I'd like to point out that
the "JSON is a subset of YAML" meme is not without controversy:
 http://search.cpan.org/~mlehmann/JSON-XS-2.26/XS.pm#JSON_and_YAML

It may not be relevant in your use-case, but I thought it worth a mention.

Tim.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: questions about concurrency control in Postgresql
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: YAML