Re: YAML - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: YAML
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070912080617p145725c8n27ac53f5432ad4a1@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: YAML  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: YAML  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> Well, if we're going to commit this, as now appears likely, we should have
> some language lawyers go over our code for both YAML and JSON with a fine
> tooth comb to make sure what we are producing is strictly According To
> Hoyle.

+1.  I'm a little concerned about the bit about the YAML specification
changing, too, but at least if we can ensure that we're compliant with
the spec that is current at the time the code goes in we have a leg to
stand on.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: YAML
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O