Re: Cancelling Requests Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Cancelling Requests Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP
Date
Msg-id 4AEF0AD6.4080107@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Cancelling Requests Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On 2/11/2009 10:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> writes:
>> On 2/11/2009 5:15 PM, Raimon Fernandez wrote:
>>> If for example I send  a SELECT * from myTable, it has 20000 rows, and
>>> postgre starts sending the rows, how I can cancel this operation ?
>
>> Assuming you're asking "is there any way to cancel a running query using
>> the postgresql tcp/ip protocol" then, as you've noted, you can cancel
>> the request until you start getting data.
>
>> After that, you can still cancel the query by establishing another
>> connection to the server and calling pg_cancel_backend( ) at the SQL
>> level. This does, unfortunately, involve the overhead of setting up and
>> tearing down a connection and the associated backend.
>
> The above distinction is nonsense.  Query cancel works the same way
> whether you have started receiving data or not --- it will open a
> transient connection in any case.  Otherwise there would be race
> condition problems if the backend is just about to start sending data.


Whoops - and thanks for clearing that up. For some reason I though it
used the existing connection if possible, but you've rather succinctly
pointed out why that wouldn't work sanely.

--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Cancelling Requests Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP
Next
From: Raimon Fernandez
Date:
Subject: Re: Cancelling Requests Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP