Re: Partitioned Tables and ORDER BY - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joe Uhl
Subject Re: Partitioned Tables and ORDER BY
Date
Msg-id 4ADB0907.7070806@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioned Tables and ORDER BY  (Michal Szymanski <mich20061@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioned Tables and ORDER BY
List pgsql-performance
This seems like a pretty major weakness in PostgreSQL partitioning.  I
have essentially settled on not being able to do queries against the
parent table when I want to order the results.  Going to have to use a
Hibernate interceptor or something similar to rewrite the statements so
they hit specific partitions, will be working on this in the coming week.

This weakness is a bummer though as it makes partitions a lot less
useful.  Having to hit specific child tables by name isn't much
different than just creating separate tables and not using partitions at
all.

Michal Szymanski wrote:
> I've described our problem here
> http://groups.google.pl/group/pgsql.performance/browse_thread/thread/54a7419381bd1565?hl=pl#
>   Michal Szymanski
> http://blog.szymanskich.net
> http://techblog.freeconet.pl/
>
>
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues with \copy from file
Next
From: Daniel Migowski
Date:
Subject: Re: Calculation of unused columns