Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> So here are the major points about this patch:
>
> - it's missing the returns declaration syntax (default value could be
> returns void?)
>
> - it would be much more friendly to users if it had a default output
> for queries, the returned object seems a good fit
>
>
>
Really? That wasn't my expectation at all. I expected that the code
would in effect be always returning void. I think you're moving the
goalposts a bit here. I don't think we need a RETURNS clause on it for
it to be useful.
cheers
andrew
