Re: Multi-pass planner - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Multi-pass planner
Date
Msg-id 4A8E202C.6030008@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multi-pass planner  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: Multi-pass planner  (decibel <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I don't think it's a bad idea, I just think you have to set your
> expectations pretty low. If the estimates are bad there isn't really
> any plan that will be guaranteed to run quickly.

Well, the way to do this is via a risk-confidence system.  That is, each
operation has a level of risk assigned to it; that is, the cost
multiplier if the estimates are wrong.  And each estimate has a level of
confidence attached.  Then you can divide the risk by the confidence,
and if it exceeds a certain level, you pick another plan which has a
lower risk/confidence level.

However, the amount of extra calculations required for even a simple
query are kind of frightning.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints
Next
From: Brendan Jurd
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: generalized index constraints