Scara Maccai <m_lists@yahoo.it> wrote:
>> Be sure to include an ORDER BY clause.
> Isn't it going to be much slower?
It might be; you'd have to test to know for sure.
> The important thing is that most of the records are stored "close"
> enough one to the other in the right order.
Then, yeah, it might not be worth the cost of sorting.
-Kevin
