Re: New trigger option of pg_standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Date
Msg-id 4A1D74E9.2070505@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New trigger option of pg_standby  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
List pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> My experience is that consensus/votes will be overruled by final
> committer, if they disagree, 
>   

That's a fairly strong statement. I can't think of an occasion when this 
has happened on any matter of significance, and I can remember many 
times when Tom, Bruce and others have bowed to the consensus despite 
their own preferences.

Bruce said the other day that we are trustees of the code, and I don't 
think I could put it better. I know I am conscious of that.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Next
From: decibel
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow vacuumdb to only analyze