Bernd Helmle wrote:
> --On Dienstag, Mai 05, 2009 16:57:50 -0400 Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>> Hex will already provide some space savings over our current encoding
>> method for most byteas anyway. It's not like we'd be making things less
>> efficient space-wise. And in compressed archives the space difference is
>> likely to dissolve to not very much, I suspect.
>
> I'm dumb: I don't understand why a hex conversion would be
> significantly faster than what we have now?
>
Quite apart from anything else you would not need the current loop over
the bytea input to calculate the result length - in hex it would just be
the input length * 2.
cheers
andrew
