Marko Kreen wrote:
> I still stand on my proposal, how about extending E'' strings with
> unicode escapes (eg. \uXXXX)? The E'' strings are already more
> clearly defined than '' and they are our "own", we don't need to
> consider random standards, but can consider our sanity.
>
>
I suspect there would be lots more support in the user community, where
\uXXXX is well understood in a number of contexts (Java and ECMAScript,
for example). It's also tolerably sane.
cheers
andrew
