Re: pg_restore dependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: pg_restore dependencies
Date
Msg-id 49DFAA90.5080504@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore dependencies  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_restore dependencies
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,  Andrew,

>> Well, we certainly want to be able to run CREATE INDEXes in parallel,
>> so this would appear to require hard-wiring some conception of shared
>> versus exclusive lock into pg_restore. I think it might be a bit late
>> to consider that for 8.4.
>
>
> I'm pretty sure I had the logic for this correct stuff originally, so
> I'm going to go back and check that.

FWIW, I've tested 3 moderately complex databases with this, and the 
locking issue happens on every one.  As a result, getting more than 3 
cores of scalability on any fairly complex DB isn't possible without 
fixing this.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escapingnotdisabled inplpgsql
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escapingnotdisabled inplpgsql