Re: Performance of subselects - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Christian Schröder
Subject Re: Performance of subselects
Date
Msg-id 49B4F352.40001@deriva.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance of subselects  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Performance of subselects  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Re: Performance of subselects  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-general
Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> you can run out of memory if too many connections try to use too much
>> of it at the same time, that's why it is advisable to set work_mem per
>> connection/query, should the connection/query require more.
>>
> Definitely.
>
I understand why this is advisable; however, something inside me hates
the idea to put this kind of database specific stuff inside an
application. How about portability? Why does the application developer
have to know about database internals? He knows sql, that should be
sufficient.
I have the (maybe naive) idea of a clear separation of database
administration (including performance tuning) and application
development. Is this idea completely wrong?

Regards,
    Christian

--
Deriva GmbH                         Tel.: +49 551 489500-42
Financial IT and Consulting         Fax:  +49 551 489500-91
Hans-Böckler-Straße 2                  http://www.deriva.de
D-37079 Göttingen

Deriva CA Certificate: http://www.deriva.de/deriva-ca.cer


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: commit/rollback in postgre 8.2
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance of subselects