Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm, does this proposal require adding a test of well-formed-ness to
> a code path that doesn't currently have one? If so, is that likely
> to contribute any noticeable slowdown?
>
> I can't offhand see an objection to this other than possible performance
> impact.
>
>
>
Yeah, testing the well-formedness might cost a bit. We could
short-circuit the test by applying some comparatively fast heuristic tests.
Or we could decide that we'll just fix the xpath prefix part for 8.3 and
keep the wrapping. I don't want to spend a huge effort on fixing
something I regard as fundamentally broken.
I'll do some tests to see what the cost of extra xml parsing might be.
cheers
andrew
We
