Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests vs existing users in an installation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
Date
Msg-id 499f2909-d6e4-4f50-d88a-0e3dc9530f4e@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests vs existing users in an installation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests vs existing users in an installation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-06-29 19:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost<sfrost@snowman.net>  writes:
>> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>>> We could make the new subdirectory be something specific like
>>> "src/test/modules/test_rolenames", but I think very likely we'll be
>>> wanting some additional test scripts that we likewise deem unsafe to
>>> run during "installcheck".  So I'd rather choose a more generic module
>>> name, but I'm not sure what ... "unsafe_tests"?
>> Agreed but haven't got any particularly good suggestions on names..
> Hearing no better suggestions, I went with "unsafe_tests" in the
> attached.

I found this directory, and it seems like a good place to add some more 
tests (other thread), but I'm puzzled why it's hidden under modules/, 
since it's not, well, a module.  Why is it not in src/test/?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation versioning
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Collation versions on Windows (help wanted, apply within)