David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> "A limitation of this feature is that an ORDER BY clause applying to
>> the result of a UNION, INTERSECT, or EXCEPT clause can only specify
>> an output column name or number, not an expression."
>>
>> Why not just say "order by 1" ?
>
> Well, in this case, I wanted the order to be the same as in the array
> that was passed.
Yeah. you can do it like this:
select foo from ( SELECT quote_ident($2[i]) as foo, i FROM generate_series(1, array_upper($2, 1)) AS s(i)
EXCEPT SELECT quote_ident(p.proname) FROM pg_catalog.pg_proc p JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace
n ON p.pronamespace = n.oid AND quote_ident(n.nspname) = quote_ident($1) ORDER BY i ) x;
>
> At any rate, your quotation of this documentation that I obviously
> missed answers my question. In the meantime, I got a different version
> with a LEFT JOIN to do what I want, so I don't need the EXCEPT at all.
> I just posted here because it looked like a bug. And though it's
> clearly not, since it's documented, it is kinda weird…
>
>
There are many odd corners, unfortunately.
cheers
andrew
