Tom Lane wrote:
> mha@postgresql.org (Magnus Hagander) writes:
>> pgsql/src/test/regress:
>> pg_regress.c (r1.57 -> r1.58)
>> (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c?r1=1.57&r2=1.58)
>
> Surely this patch is wrong. It is suppressing, not fixing, a critical
> warning about a datatype mismatch.
You mean the signed vs unsigned part? Other than that, int and dword are
always the same on win32...
//Magnus
