The difference between RESTRICT and NO ACTION - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bill Todd
Subject The difference between RESTRICT and NO ACTION
Date
Msg-id 497E3C0F.5030003@dbginc.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: The difference between RESTRICT and NO ACTION
Re: The difference between RESTRICT and NO ACTION
List pgsql-general
In discussing foreign key constraints the manual makes the following
statement about the difference between RESTRICT and NO ACTION.

"(The essential difference between these two choices is that |NO ACTION|
allows the check to be deferred until later in the transaction, whereas
|RESTRICT| does not.)"

Can someone explain what this means in practical terms? Do both options
generate the same error message? Does "until later in the transaction"
mean that NO ACTION is not checked until an attempt is made to commit
the transaction?

If someone can point me to a more detailed explanation I would
appreciate it. Thanks.

Bill

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Please, could I subscribe to this list? Thanks.
Next
From: Bill Todd
Date:
Subject: Re: The difference between RESTRICT and NO ACTION