Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> The pg_dump output was never backward compatible. (The input is.) So
>> the output of parallel restore need not be backward compatible either.
>> (Unless this mandate has changed dramatically while I was not
>> looking?) So always issue TRUNCATE ONLY, if that is what the logic
>> requires. The additional benefit is that this will fail safely on
>> older versions.
> No it won't fail safely on older versions, because the truncate is part
> of a transaction, and thus the data member(s) will all fail.
I meant "safe" as in, it won't randomly delete more data than you
intended. I didn't mean in as in do-what-I-mean. :-)
> I'd like to
> be able to use 8.4 pg_restore to run parallel restores on older servers,
> and the fix for this is utterly trivial. I'll be posting a new patch
> with it in today.
Works for me.
