Re: Slow update - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Herouth Maoz
Subject Re: Slow update
Date
Msg-id 49770BE9.50804@unicell.co.il
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slow update  ("Marc Mamin" <M.Mamin@intershop.de>)
Responses Re: Slow update  ("Marc Mamin" <M.Mamin@intershop.de>)
List pgsql-general

Marc Mamin wrote:

Hello,
 
- did you vacuum your tables recently ?
 
- What I miss in your query is a check for the rows that do not need to be udated:
 
AND NOT (service = b.service
               AND status = b.status
              AND has_notification = gateway_id NOT IN (4,101,102)
              AND operator = COALESCE( b.actual_target_network_id,  b.requested_target_network_id   )
 
 
depending on the fraction of rows that are already up to date, the might fasten your process quite a lot...
I don't see why it would. As far as I know, the high saving in update time is done by using the indices. All the other conditions that are not on indices are all checked using a sequential scan on the rows that were brought from the index, so adding more conditions wouldn't make this a lot faster - maybe even slower because more comparisons are made.

In any case, the logic of the database is that the records that have delivered = 0 are always a subset of the records that are changed in this query, so querying on delivered=0 - which is an indexed query - actually make the above redundant.

Thanks for your response,
Herouth

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Marc Mamin"
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow update
Next
From: Jasen Betts
Date:
Subject: Re: import sql dump with psql - language creation throws error