Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com> writes:
> On 11/08/10 21:27, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yes. Mike, are you expecting to submit a new version before the end of
>> the week?
> Yes and here it is, apologies for the delay. I have re-implemented
> xml_is_well_formed such that it is sensitive to the XMLOPTION. The
> additional _document and _content methods are now present. Tests and
> documentation adjusted to suit.
Applied with minor cleanups, mostly in the documentation. The only
thing that seems worth remarking on is that since xml_is_well_formed
now depends on a GUC variable, it *cannot* be marked IMMUTABLE. The
right marking in such cases is STABLE.
regards, tom lane
