On 06.03.25 11:55, Shay Rojansky wrote:
> For whatever it's worth, I'll note that SQL Server's OPENJSON does do
> this (so when a JSON string property is extracted as a binary type,
> base64 encoding is assumed). Other databases also have very specific
> documented conversion rules for JSON_VALUE RETURNING (Oracle <https://
> docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/19/adjsn/clauses-
> used-in-functions-and-conditions-for-json.html#GUID-
> DE9F29D3-1C23-4271-9DCD-E585866576D2>, DB2 <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/
> i/7.3?topic=functions-json-table#rbafzscajsontable__json_result> (table
> 1)). I'm basically trying to show that RETURNING definitely isn't a
> simple cast-from-string in other databases, but is a distinct conversion
> mechanism that takes into account the fact the the origin data comes
> from JSON.
According to the SQL standard, once you account for various special
cases (non-scalar values, null values), it comes down to a cast.
