Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh, and another thing --- should variadic parameters be defaultable?
> The current patch doesn't allow it but it looks more like an oversight
> than anything that was thought through. The boundary case for variadic
> parameters is a bit weird already:
From a user perspective, if we just told people "polymorphic and
variadic parameters do not accept defaults", and give people an error
message, I can't imagine anyone caring. Then we can support them
later if someone wants to troubleshoot the corner cases.
--Josh
