Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> This method is utterly, utterly unacceptable; you're probably trashing
>> the contents of a disk buffer there.
>>
>
> ... however, it seems reasonable to assume that the *new* tuple is just
> local storage. Why don't you just poke the old tuple's OID into the new
> one before comparing?
>
>
>
OK, that will be easy enough. I assume I should still put InvalidOid
back again afterwards, in case someone downstream relies on it.
cheers
andrew
