Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly
Date
Msg-id 972.1225910504@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... however, it seems reasonable to assume that the *new* tuple is just
>> local storage.  Why don't you just poke the old tuple's OID into the new
>> one before comparing?

> OK, that will be easy enough. I assume I should still put InvalidOid 
> back again afterwards, in case someone downstream relies on it.

Can't imagine what ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Date:
Subject: Multiple postmaster installation with RPMs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly