Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly
Date
Msg-id 478.1225908768@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> This method is utterly, utterly unacceptable; you're probably trashing
> the contents of a disk buffer there.

... however, it seems reasonable to assume that the *new* tuple is just
local storage.  Why don't you just poke the old tuple's OID into the new
one before comparing?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: The suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() works incorrectly
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] In-place upgrade