Incorrect cursor behaviour with gist index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Teodor Sigaev
Subject Incorrect cursor behaviour with gist index
Date
Msg-id 48F8DA70.7010804@sigaev.ru
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Incorrect cursor behaviour with gist index
List pgsql-hackers
I'm back, sorry for a long absence.

About this bug: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-09/msg00086.php

Unfortunately, GiST index doesn't work with change direction of scan. I.e. it 
can't move forward then move backward and this behaviour was from the beginning.

I think it's fixable, although GiST doesn't store on page left links (only right 
links) and doesn't store parent page pointer. That's needed because matched 
entries in GiST isn't stored consecutively unlike to BTree. So, price for it 
will be storing in memory or stack all numbers of visited pages in index even 
they will not be used. In worst case it's 2^32 of  GISTSearchStack. Right now it 
occupies 24-32 bytes depending on sizeof(void*), and it will be needed to add 
one more pointer to make double-linked stack. So, about 32Mb. Is it acceptable?

Nevertheless, it doesn't solve problem with concurrent page splitting what can 
cause different order between forward and backward scan in one cursor.

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
  WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: small bug in hlCover
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks