Re: Chaotically weird execution plan - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Chaotically weird execution plan
Date
Msg-id 48D9943B.9060801@postnewspapers.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Chaotically weird execution plan  (Einars <einars@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Chaotically weird execution plan  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Einars wrote:
> As query plan shows, it got the
> correct answer, 15888, very fast: the rest of the 13 seconds it's just
> rechecking all the comments for some weird reasons.

I'd already written: "If you need the test for status = 1, consider a
partial index" when I noticed your schema definition:

>     "comments_created_by" btree (created_by) WHERE status = 1

I find it hard to guess why it's having to recheck the WHERE clause
given the use of a partial index that should cover that nicely. I don't
see how it could be a visibility issue (in that I thought tuples were
read and tested for visibility as part of the initial heap scan) but I
don't see what else it could be.

It seems odd to me, so I'm really interested in seeing what others have
to say on this.

--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Einars
Date:
Subject: Chaotically weird execution plan
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Chaotically weird execution plan