Hi,
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> If this were a nice pluggable library I'd agree, but AFAIK it's not, and
> I don't see great value in reinventing the wheel.
I certainly agree.
However, I thought of it more like the archive_command, as proposed by
Hannu. That way we don't need to reinvent any wheel and still the
standby could trigger the base data synchronization itself.
Regards
Markus Wanner
