Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Wanner
Subject Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
Date
Msg-id 48C947F2.4020001@bluegap.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Tom Lane wrote:
> No, that's not what I had in mind at all, just the ability to deliver
> one of a specified set of event notifications --- ie, get around the
> fact that Unix only gives us two user-definable signal types.

Ah, okay. And I already thought you'd like imessages :-(

> For signals sent from other backends, it'd be sufficient to put a
> bitmask field into PGPROC entries, which the sender could OR bits into
> before sending the one "real" signal event (either SIGUSR1 or SIGUSR2).

That might work for expanding the number of available signals, yes.

Regards

Markus Wanner


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Lawrence, Ramon"
Date:
Subject: Re: Potential Join Performance Issue
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Potential Join Performance Issue