Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date
Msg-id 48BEAB53.3020501@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Greg Stark <greg.stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark wrote:
> I don't think worrying about the message we send to users is reasonable. 
> We can take responsibilty for the messages we output but punishing our 
> users to teach them a lesson is being actively user-hostile

There is no arguing that MB != Mb; nor is there anything user-hostile 
behind the idea of doing it the right way.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg"
Date:
Subject: Re: Function call order dependency
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Question regarding the database page layout.