Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date
Msg-id 1220456249.12162.25.camel@huvostro
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 08:20 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Greg Stark wrote:
> > I don't think worrying about the message we send to users is reasonable. 
> > We can take responsibilty for the messages we output but punishing our 
> > users to teach them a lesson is being actively user-hostile
> 
> There is no arguing that MB != Mb; 

The whole point of this discussion is, that mostly people expect 
MB == Mb = mb == mB, especially if they see weird constructs like kB
used (k for Kilo, or actually Kibi).

> nor is there anything user-hostile behind the idea of doing it the right way.

I was not trying to expose some sinister plan, just pointing out that
users seldom expect that kind of surprise.

--------------
Hannu




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Next
From: "Hitoshi Harada"
Date:
Subject: Re: Window functions doc patch