Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date
Msg-id ACDD8907-29A6-4F28-B33C-3F756EB1607F@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sure if people want to do it the right way more power to them. What  
you're talking about is punishing people when they don't live up to  
your standards.

greg

On 3 Sep 2008, at 16:20, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> Greg Stark wrote:
>> I don't think worrying about the message we send to users is  
>> reasonable. We can take responsibilty for the messages we output  
>> but punishing our users to teach them a lesson is being actively  
>> user-hostile
>
> There is no arguing that MB != Mb; nor is there anything user- 
> hostile behind the idea of doing it the right way.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Next
From: Joshua Drake
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code